{"id":31345,"date":"2026-06-21T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-21T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/niet-gecategoriseerd\/how-do-you-implement-ces-step-by-step-in-your-organization\/"},"modified":"2026-06-29T14:48:12","modified_gmt":"2026-06-29T12:48:12","slug":"how-do-you-implement-ces-step-by-step-in-your-organization","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/contact-center\/how-do-you-implement-ces-step-by-step-in-your-organization\/","title":{"rendered":"How do you implement CES step by step in your organization?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Implementing the Customer Effort Score step by step starts with one key question for your customer: How easy was it to resolve your issue? Based on that answer, you build a measurement framework that shows you where customers get stuck when interacting with your organization. In this article, we answer the six most frequently asked questions about CES, from the basics to the first concrete steps for improvement. Want to get a head start on what a strong <a href=\"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/cx-solutions-development\/\">customer engagement approach<\/a> looks like? The rest of this article will provide you with the building blocks to achieve it.    <\/p>\n<h2>What exactly does the Customer Effort Score measure?<\/h2>\n<p>The Customer Effort Score (CES) measures how much effort a customer had to put in to get a question answered or a problem resolved. Customers rate this on a scale, usually from 1 to 7, where a low score indicates little effort and a high score indicates a lot of effort. The less effort required, the greater the likelihood of customer loyalty.  <\/p>\n<p>CES is deliberately distinct from other metrics such as NPS (Net Promoter Score) or CSAT (Customer Satisfaction). While NPS measures the overall relationship and CSAT provides a snapshot of satisfaction, CES focuses specifically on friction within an interaction. Research in the field of customer experience consistently shows that reducing customer effort correlates more strongly with loyalty than creating a positive surprise.  <\/p>\n<p>The score reflects the experience surrounding a specific point of contact, such as a phone call, a chat conversation, or the submission of a complaint. This makes CES particularly useful for organizations that want to optimize their customer interactions at the operational level. <\/p>\n<h2>When is CES the right metric to use?<\/h2>\n<p>CES is the right metric when you want to measure how smoothly a specific customer interaction goes, not how satisfied a customer is in general. Use CES immediately after a touchpoint such as a service call, a return request, or an onboarding step. The metric is most valuable in situations where customers have to take action or make arrangements.  <\/p>\n<p>CES is less suitable if you want to evaluate the overall customer relationship or measure willingness to recommend your business. In those cases, NPS is a better fit. Combine the two if you want to understand both operational friction and strategic loyalty.  <\/p>\n<p>Practical situations where CES works well:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Immediately after a phone call or chat with customer service<\/li>\n<li>After navigating through a self-service environment or FAQ<\/li>\n<li>After filing or resolving a complaint<\/li>\n<li>After an onboarding process or product activation<\/li>\n<li>After a return or cancellation request<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>So be sure to choose CES as a supplement to your existing measurement structure, not as a replacement for everything you already measure.<\/p>\n<h2>How do you formulate a CES question correctly?<\/h2>\n<p>The standard CES question is: &#8220;To what extent do you agree with the following statement: It was easy to resolve my issue?&#8221; Customers respond on a 7-point scale ranging from &#8220;strongly disagree&#8221; to &#8220;strongly agree.&#8221; This wording is intentionally phrased positively because it yields more reliable responses than a negative or neutral question.  <\/p>\n<p>A few guidelines for a good CES question:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Be specific:<\/strong> relate the question to the interaction that just took place, not to the organization in general<\/li>\n<li><strong>Keep it brief:<\/strong> one question, one scale, and no more than one open-ended follow-up question<\/li>\n<li><strong>Use a consistent scale:<\/strong> don&#8217;t switch between 5-point and 7-point scales across different channels<\/li>\n<li><strong>Add an optional open-ended question:<\/strong> &#8220;What could have been easier?&#8221; to gain valuable qualitative insights<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Avoid questions like &#8220;How satisfied are you?&#8221; because that&#8217;s CSAT, not CES. The key question is always about effort or ease, not about satisfaction or appreciation. <\/p>\n<h2>Through which channels can you send CES surveys?<\/h2>\n<p>You can send CES surveys via email, SMS, web chat, WhatsApp, in-app notifications, and telephone IVR systems. The most effective channel is the one through which the interaction took place. A customer who was assisted via chat prefers to receive the survey directly in that same chat window, immediately after the conversation ends.  <\/p>\n<p>Timing is just as important as the channel. Ideally, send the survey within five to ten minutes of the initial contact. The longer you wait, the fuzzier the memory becomes and the less reliable the response.  <\/p>\n<h3>Channel-Specific Considerations<\/h3>\n<p>Email gives you more space for a brief explanation, but the response rate drops quickly if the survey takes longer than one minute to complete. So stick to the main question and one optional open-ended question. Via text message or WhatsApp, a direct link to a single question works best. Long questionnaires are rarely completed on mobile devices.   <\/p>\n<h3>Integration with your existing systems<\/h3>\n<p>Make sure your CES tool integrates with your contact center or CRM system. This allows you to link scores to specific interactions, agents, or product categories. Without that integration, you\u2019ll have a score, but no context to act on it. See how <a href=\"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/contact-center\/\">contact center technology<\/a> supports these integrations.   <\/p>\n<h2>How do you calculate and interpret your CES score?<\/h2>\n<p>The most commonly used method for calculating CES is the percentage of respondents who \u201cagree\u201d or \u201cstrongly agree\u201d with the statement that it was easy, minus the percentage who \u201cdisagree\u201d or \u201cstrongly disagree.\u201d A positive score means that more customers found it easy than difficult. <\/p>\n<p>On a 7-point scale, scores of 5, 6, and 7 are generally considered positive (little difficulty), scores of 1, 2, and 3 are considered negative (great difficulty), and a score of 4 is considered neutral. The calculation is as follows: <\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Count the percentage of respondents who scored a 5, 6, or 7 on<\/li>\n<li>Subtract the percentage of respondents who scored a 1, 2, or 3 from that figure<\/li>\n<li>The result is your CES score, expressed as a number between -100 and +100<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>A score above zero means that the majority of users experience little difficulty. The higher the score, the better. Use your own historical scores as a reference point, because absolute benchmarks vary greatly by industry and type of interaction.  <\/p>\n<h2>What actions do you take based on CES results?<\/h2>\n<p>Based on CES results, take targeted actions to reduce friction at specific touchpoints. First, analyze where the lowest scores are coming from: which channel, which type of question, which department, or which time of day. Next, link those insights to concrete improvements in your processes, routing, or self-service options.  <\/p>\n<p>A practical three-step approach:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Segment your scores:<\/strong> break down results by channel, reason for contact, and employee level to identify patterns<\/li>\n<li><strong>Analyze the open-ended responses:<\/strong> Qualitative feedback reveals the root cause of a low score, not just the symptom<\/li>\n<li><strong>Set priorities based on volume and impact:<\/strong> first improve the contact reasons that occur most frequently and have the lowest scores<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Common improvement measures include simplifying IVR menus, improving knowledge bases for employees, adding self-service options for frequently asked questions, and reducing the number of times customers have to repeat their story when they are transferred.<\/p>\n<h2>How Pegamento Helps Improve Your CES<\/h2>\n<p>At Pegamento, we help organizations systematically reduce friction in customer interactions\u2014which is precisely what CES measures. Our approach combines omnichannel contact center technology, smart routing, and AI-driven self-service into a cohesive whole. No fragmented systems, no complex vendor structure\u2014just everything under one roof.  <\/p>\n<p>What specifically we can do for you:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Smart IVR and call routing so customers are connected directly to the right person<\/li>\n<li>Omnichannel integration of phone, chat, WhatsApp, and email into a single, easy-to-use platform<\/li>\n<li>AI-powered self-service that answers frequently asked questions outside of business hours<\/li>\n<li>Real-time reports that allow you to link CES scores to specific touchpoints and areas for improvement<\/li>\n<li>Customized solutions using standard building blocks, so you can get started quickly without costly custom development projects<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Would you like to know how your organization can reduce customer effort? <a href=\"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/contact-2\/\">Contact us<\/a>, and we\u2019ll explore the possibilities together.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-seoaic-faq-block\">\n    <h2 class=\"seoaic-faq-section-title\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n            <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoeveel respondenten heb je nodig voordat je CES-scores betrouwbaar zijn?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Voor betrouwbare CES-inzichten heb je minimaal 30 tot 50 responses per segment nodig voordat je conclusies trekt. Bij kleinere volumes kunnen uitschieters de score sterk be\u00efnvloeden. Wacht bij lage responsaantallen met het doorvoeren van grote proceswijzigingen en gebruik de data eerst als signaal om dieper te onderzoeken via kwalitatieve gesprekken met klanten.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Wat is een goede CES-score en hoe weet ik of mijn score verbeterd moet worden?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Er bestaat geen universele &#8216;goede&#8217; CES-score, omdat benchmarks sterk verschillen per sector, kanaal en type interactie. De meest waardevolle referentie is je eigen historische trend: verbetert je score over tijd, dan ga je de goede kant op. Als vuistregel geldt dat een positieve score (boven nul) betekent dat meer klanten weinig moeite ervaarden dan veel, maar stuur altijd op verbetering ten opzichte van je eigen baseline in plaats van op een extern getal.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoe voorkom ik een lage responsrate op mijn CES-surveys?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                De grootste boosdoeners voor een lage responsrate zijn een te lange survey, een te late verzending en een kanaal dat niet aansluit bij de interactie. Houd de survey tot maximaal twee vragen, verstuur hem binnen vijf minuten na het contactmoment en gebruik bij voorkeur hetzelfde kanaal als de interactie zelf. Een korte, vriendelijke aanhef die uitlegt waarom de feedback waardevol is, verhoogt de responsrate merkbaar.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Kan ik CES ook inzetten voor digitale selfservice-omgevingen zoals een FAQ-pagina of chatbot?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Ja, CES is juist zeer geschikt voor digitale selfservice omdat het meet of een klant zijn doel zonder moeite heeft bereikt. Voeg de CES-vraag toe aan het einde van een chatbotgesprek of na het bekijken van een kennisbankpagina met een knop zoals &#8216;Was dit nuttig?&#8217;. Lage scores op specifieke selfservice-onderwerpen vertellen je precies welke content of flows je moet verbeteren om herhaalcontact te voorkomen.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Wat doe ik als mijn CES-scores per kanaal sterk van elkaar verschillen?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Grote verschillen tussen kanalen zijn een waardevolle signaalbron, geen probleem op zich. Analyseer welk kanaal consistent lager scoort en onderzoek via de open antwoorden wat de onderliggende oorzaak is: gaat het om langere wachttijden, onduidelijke navigatie of onvoldoende kennis bij medewerkers? Gebruik het best scorende kanaal als intern referentiepunt en onderzoek welke elementen daarvan je kunt toepassen op de kanalen met hogere frictie.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoe betrek ik mijn klantenserviceteam bij het verbeteren van CES-scores zonder weerstand te cre\u00ebren?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                De grootste valkuil is CES gebruiken als beoordelingsinstrument voor individuele medewerkers in plaats van als verbtertool voor processen. Introduceer CES als een gedeeld teamdoel en leg de nadruk op systeemverbeteringen, zoals betere kennisbanken of slimmere routing, in plaats van op individuele prestaties. Betrek medewerkers actief bij het analyseren van lage scores: zij kennen de oorzaken van frictie vaak beter dan de data alleen laten zien.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoe vaak moet ik mijn CES-aanpak en vraagstelling evalueren?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Evalueer je CES-vraagstelling en meetmomenten minimaal eens per kwartaal, zeker in de eerste zes maanden na implementatie. Controleer of de vraag nog aansluit bij de contactmomenten die je meet, of de responsrate stabiel is en of de scores in lijn zijn met de kwalitatieve feedback die je ontvangt. Pas de aanpak aan als je processen of kanalen significant veranderen, maar wijzig de vraagstelling zo min mogelijk om historische vergelijkbaarheid te behouden.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Discover how the Customer Effort Score identifies and resolves friction in customer interactions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":31346,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[500],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-contact-center"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31345"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31345\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31582,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31345\/revisions\/31582"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31346"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}