{"id":31639,"date":"2026-06-30T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-30T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/niet-gecategoriseerd\/what-is-a-good-csat-score-and-how-do-you-benchmark-it\/"},"modified":"2026-06-30T10:00:40","modified_gmt":"2026-06-30T08:00:40","slug":"what-is-a-good-csat-score-and-how-do-you-benchmark-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/contact-center\/what-is-a-good-csat-score-and-how-do-you-benchmark-it\/","title":{"rendered":"What is a good CSAT score, and how do you benchmark it?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A good CSAT score typically ranges between 75% and 85%, with scores above 80% considered strong in most industries. The exact threshold varies by industry: what\u2019s considered excellent in one sector may be merely average in another. In this article, we answer the most frequently asked questions about CSAT\u2014from calculation to benchmarking and improvement\u2014so you know exactly where you stand and what you can do. Want to get a broader perspective on customer engagement? Then check out our <a href=\"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/cx-solutions-development\/\">CX solutions<\/a>.    <\/p>\n<h2>What is considered a good CSAT score?<\/h2>\n<p>A CSAT score of 75% or higher is generally considered good, and anything above 85% is considered excellent. Scores below 60% are a clear indication that there are structural problems with the customer experience. The score is expressed as the percentage of customers who report being satisfied or very satisfied.  <\/p>\n<p>Important to remember: a CSAT score is a snapshot. It\u2019s not just about the absolute number, but about the trend over time. A score of 72% that rises month after month tells a different story than a score of 80% that is slowly declining. If you measure your CSAT on a regular basis, you\u2019ll see patterns that help you make targeted improvements rather than just reacting to incidents.   <\/p>\n<p>The response rate is also a factor. A CSAT score of 90% sounds great, but if only 5% of your customers complete the survey, the results are not very representative. Aim for a response rate of at least 20% to ensure reliable insights.  <\/p>\n<h2>How does a good CSAT score vary by industry?<\/h2>\n<p>A good CSAT score varies significantly by industry, as customer expectations and the complexity of interactions differ greatly. In the retail sector, benchmarks are generally higher than in the telecom sector, simply because retail customers more often have positive, proactive experiences than telecom customers, who often call to report problems. <\/p>\n<p>Some general guidelines by sector:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Retail and e-commerce:<\/strong> Scores ranging from 80% to 90% are common and expected<\/li>\n<li><strong>Financial services:<\/strong> 75% to 85% is considered a solid benchmark<\/li>\n<li><strong>Government and the public sector:<\/strong> 65% to 75% is a realistic figure given the complexity of service delivery<\/li>\n<li><strong>Telecom and internet providers:<\/strong> 65% to 75%; a sector that consistently scores lower due to the nature of customer contact<\/li>\n<li><strong>Healthcare and well-being:<\/strong> 80% to 90%, with empathy and accessibility being major factors<\/li>\n<li><strong>Housing cooperatives and utility companies:<\/strong> 70% to 80% is a realistic target<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Use industry-specific benchmarks as a reference point, not a universal standard. Also compare your scores with your own historical data, as that provides the most accurate picture of your progress. <\/p>\n<h2>What is the difference between CSAT, NPS, and CES?<\/h2>\n<p>CSAT, NPS, and CES each measure a different aspect of the customer experience. CSAT measures satisfaction with a specific interaction, NPS measures overall loyalty and willingness to recommend, and CES measures how much effort a customer had to put in to get help. Together, they provide a complete picture of your customer experience.  <\/p>\n<h3>CSAT: Satisfaction at the Interaction Level<\/h3>\n<p>The Customer Satisfaction Score measures how satisfied a customer is with a specific interaction, such as a phone call, a chat, or a repair. The question is usually: \u201cHow satisfied are you with this interaction?\u201d on a scale of 1 to 5. CSAT is ideal for operational management: you can quickly see which channels or employees are performing well and where improvements are needed.  <\/p>\n<h3>NPS: Loyalty at the Customer Relationship Level<\/h3>\n<p>The Net Promoter Score measures how likely a customer is to recommend you to others, on a scale of 0 to 10. NPS is a strategic metric that reflects the overall relationship with your brand. A high NPS means that customers consistently have positive experiences, not just during a single touchpoint.  <\/p>\n<h3>CES: Effort and Convenience<\/h3>\n<p>The Customer Effort Score measures how much effort a customer had to expend to get their question answered. Research consistently shows that reducing customer effort is one of the strongest predictors of loyalty. CES is particularly valuable for optimizing self-service and digital channels.  <\/p>\n<h2>How do you calculate a CSAT score correctly?<\/h2>\n<p>You calculate a CSAT score by dividing the number of positive responses by the total number of completed surveys, then multiplying by 100. Positive responses are typically those from respondents who indicate they are \u201csatisfied\u201d or \u201cvery satisfied\u201d\u2014that is, the two highest options on a five-point scale. <\/p>\n<p>The formula is as follows:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Step 1:<\/strong> Count the number of respondents who selected &#8220;satisfied&#8221; or &#8220;very satisfied&#8221;<\/li>\n<li><strong>Step 2:<\/strong> Divide this by the total number of completed surveys (not the number sent)<\/li>\n<li><strong>Step 3:<\/strong> Multiply by 100 to get a percentage<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Example: 240 positive responses out of 300 completed surveys result in a CSAT of 80%. Be sure not to count neutral and negative scores as positive, even if they fall in the middle of the scale. Consistency in the calculation method is essential for comparing scores over time.  <\/p>\n<h2>When and how often should you measure CSAT?<\/h2>\n<p>You should measure CSAT immediately after a customer interaction, preferably within 24 hours. The longer you wait, the less accurate the customer\u2019s recollection will be and the lower the response rate will be. As for the frequency of measurement: measure after every relevant touchpoint, not just periodically.  <\/p>\n<p>Practical guidelines for the measurement:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>After contacting them by phone:<\/strong> Send a short text message or email survey within an hour<\/li>\n<li><strong>After a chat or WhatsApp conversation:<\/strong> ask the question right at the end of the conversation in the chat window<\/li>\n<li><strong>After resolving a complaint:<\/strong> wait 24 to 48 hours to give the customer time to process the outcome<\/li>\n<li><strong>After installation or delivery:<\/strong> take the measurement as soon as the service or product is received<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>In addition to transactional surveys, it\u2019s a good idea to conduct a relational survey periodically\u2014for example, every quarter\u2014to gauge overall satisfaction independently of specific interactions. Combine this with your NPS survey to get a complete picture. <\/p>\n<h2>How can you systematically improve a low CSAT score?<\/h2>\n<p>You can systematically improve a low CSAT score by first analyzing the root causes rather than reacting immediately to the symptoms. Identify which channels, departments, or touchpoints have the lowest scores, and look for patterns in the open-ended feedback customers provide. Improvement starts with understanding, not with assumptions.  <\/p>\n<p>The most effective steps for improvement are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Analyze the low scores by channel:<\/strong> phone, chat, and email often yield different results; treat them separately<\/li>\n<li><strong>Reduce the effort required of the customer:<\/strong> better routing, faster responses, and fewer transfers immediately reduce frustration<\/li>\n<li><strong>Give employees better tools and context:<\/strong> an employee who can immediately see a customer\u2019s history can provide faster and more personalized assistance<\/li>\n<li><strong>Improve accessibility outside of business hours:<\/strong> self-service options and automated responses to frequently asked questions increase satisfaction even outside of peak times<\/li>\n<li><strong>Close the feedback loop:<\/strong> actively respond to negative ratings, reach out to dissatisfied customers, and show that you take their feedback seriously<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Structural improvement requires a combined approach involving technology, processes, and people. Fragmented systems are one of the main causes of low CSAT scores: when employees have to switch between multiple screens and customers have to repeat their story over and over again, satisfaction inevitably declines. <\/p>\n<h2>How Pegamento Helps Improve Your CSAT Score<\/h2>\n<p>We help organizations systematically improve their CSAT scores by addressing the root causes of low satisfaction. No quick fixes\u2014just a comprehensive approach that integrates technology, processes, and customer interactions. Everything under one roof, without the complexity of supplier management.  <\/p>\n<p>What we specifically offer:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Omnichannel contact center technology<\/strong> that allows customers to switch seamlessly between phone, chat, WhatsApp, and email without having to repeat themselves<\/li>\n<li><strong>Intelligent routing<\/strong> that directs customers directly to the right agent or the right answer, without unnecessary transfers<\/li>\n<li><strong>Agentic AI assistants<\/strong> that independently handle frequently asked questions outside of business hours, ensuring that availability is no longer a barrier to customer satisfaction<\/li>\n<li><strong>Centralized reporting and analytics<\/strong> across all channels, so you can pinpoint exactly where your CSAT is low and why<\/li>\n<li><strong>Customized solutions using standard building blocks<\/strong>, tailored to your industry and organization size, without costly customization<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Are you curious about how our <a href=\"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/contact-center\/\">contact center technology<\/a> can help improve your CSAT score? <a href=\"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/contact-2\/\">Get in touch<\/a>, and we\u2019ll explore the possibilities together.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-seoaic-faq-block\">\n    <h2 class=\"seoaic-faq-section-title\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n            <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Wat is een realistische CSAT-doelstelling als ik nu laag scoor?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Begin met een haalbare verbetering van 5 tot 10 procentpunten over een periode van drie tot zes maanden, in plaats van direct te mikken op een topscore. Stel tussentijdse mijlpalen in per kanaal of afdeling, zodat je voortgang zichtbaar en meetbaar blijft. Een geleidelijke, structurele stijging is waardevoller dan een tijdelijke piek die daarna weer wegzakt.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoeveel respondenten heb ik minimaal nodig voor een betrouwbare CSAT score?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Als vuistregel geldt dat je minimaal 100 ingevulde enqu\u00eates per meetperiode nodig hebt om statistisch betrouwbare conclusies te trekken. Heb je meerdere kanalen of teams, dan heb je per segment minimaal 30 tot 50 responses nodig om zinvolle vergelijkingen te maken. Een lage respons rate (onder de 20%) is een even groot probleem als een lage score zelf, omdat de resultaten dan niet representatief zijn voor je volledige klantenbestand.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Wat doe ik als mijn CSAT score sterk verschilt tussen kanalen?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Grote verschillen tussen kanalen zijn een waardevol signaal: ze wijzen op specifieke knelpunten in processen, training of technologie per kanaal. Analyseer eerst de open feedback per kanaal afzonderlijk om te begrijpen wat de oorzaak is \u2014 een lage score op telefonie wijst vaak op lange wachttijden of onvoldoende eerstelijnsoplossing, terwijl een lage score op e-mail vaker te maken heeft met trage responstijden of onpersoonlijke antwoorden. Behandel elk kanaal als een apart verbetertraject met eigen doelstellingen en acties.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Kan een te hoge CSAT score ook een probleem zijn?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Ja, een structureel hoge CSAT score van boven de 95% kan duiden op een te beperkte steekproef, een onbewuste selectiebias in wie je enqu\u00eates stuurt, of vragen die te weinig onderscheidend zijn. Klanten die al heel tevreden zijn, vullen enqu\u00eates vaker in dan ontevreden klanten, waardoor je score vertekend kan zijn. Controleer regelmatig je meetmethode en vergelijk je CSAT met andere metrics zoals NPS en churn om een volledig en eerlijk beeld te krijgen.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoe betrek ik mijn medewerkers bij het verbeteren van de CSAT score?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Deel CSAT-resultaten transparant met je team en koppel scores terug op individueel en teamniveau, zodat medewerkers direct zien wat de impact van hun werk is op klanttevredenheid. Gebruik lage scores niet als afrekenmiddel, maar als vertrekpunt voor coaching en procesverbetering. Medewerkers die begrijpen hoe hun handelen de klantbeleving be\u00efnvloedt, zijn gemotiveerder om actief bij te dragen aan verbetering.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Welke CSAT-tools of platforms zijn geschikt voor mijn organisatie?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                De keuze voor een CSAT-tool hangt af van je kanalen, organisatiegrootte en de mate van integratie die je nodig hebt. Voor kleinere organisaties zijn tools zoals Typeform, SurveyMonkey of Google Forms een laagdrempelige start, terwijl grotere organisaties baat hebben bij ge\u00efntegreerde platforms die CSAT-metingen direct koppelen aan je contactcenter en CRM. Zorg er altijd voor dat de tool enqu\u00eates kan versturen via de kanalen waar jouw klanten actief zijn, zoals SMS, e-mail of WhatsApp, voor de hoogste respons rate.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n                <div class=\"seoaic-faq-item\">\n            <h3 class=\"seoaic-question\">\n                Hoe lang duurt het voordat verbeteringen zichtbaar worden in mijn CSAT score?            <\/h3>\n            <p class=\"seoaic-answer\">\n                Operationele verbeteringen zoals snellere routing, betere bereikbaarheid of kortere wachttijden zijn vaak al binnen vier tot acht weken zichtbaar in je CSAT scores. Structurele verbeteringen die te maken hebben met cultuur, training of systemen vragen doorgaans drie tot zes maanden voordat ze consistent doorwerken in de cijfers. Meet daarom maandelijks en kijk naar de trend over meerdere periodes, niet naar individuele uitschieters.            <\/p>\n        <\/div>\n        <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What is a good CSAT score? Learn how to benchmark by industry and systematically improve the customer experience. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":31640,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[500],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31639","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-contact-center"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31639","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31639"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31639\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31641,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31639\/revisions\/31641"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31640"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pegamento.nl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}